Christopher Rhone brings over 20 years of civil litigation experience to the defence of his clients. His practice includes the successful defence of complex litigation including class actions, insurance coverage disputes, construction defects, and serious personal injuries.
Christopher has appeared before the Supreme Court of Canada and before all levels of provincial superior courts and administrative tribunals.
In addition to litigated claims before the courts, Christopher has extensive mediation experience. Together with Ward Branch (now a justice of the B.C. Supreme Court), he assisted a leading Canadian insurer through B.C.’s infamous “leaky condo” crisis. This included attending in excess of 100 mediations and representing the insurer before the courts.
Christopher also regularly provides insurance coverage opinions to insurers in relation to all forms of insurance policies. This assists insurers in making practical and timely coverage decisions when faced with difficult or high stakes circumstances.
Christopher is a supporter of the BCSPCA and acts in animal cruelty matters before administrative tribunals and the courts.
Before admission to the practice of law, Christopher completed a judicial law clerkship with the British Columbia Court of Appeal.
Christopher is called to the bar in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, the Northwest Territories, and the Yukon. He acts for clients across Canada.
In his spare time, Christopher enjoys cycling, spending time with his family, and hiking with his dog Murphy.
*Christopher Rhone Law Corporation
Areas of Practice
- General Civil Litigation
- Insurance Defence and Coverage
- Class Actions and Administrative Law
Professional Memberships and Education
- Law Society of British Columbia (2001)
- Law Society of Ontario
- Law Society of Alberta
- Law Society of the Northwest Territories
- Law Society of Yukon
- Licensed to Practice in other provinces per National Mobility Agreement
- Canadian Bar Association
- Defense Research Institute (DRI)
- LL.B. Edinburgh University / University of Victoria
- B.Sc. (Hons. Biology) University of Western Ontario
- Best Lawyers, Recognized (Insurance)
Chris has successfully represented clients before courts and tribunals in numerous reported cases including claims for damages, injunctions and declaratory relief. Several examples are listed below.
- Workman Optometry v. Certas Home and Auto Insurance, 2023 ONSC 3356 (successful defence of insurers in COVID-19 business interruption class action trial)
- Henderson v Northbridge General Insurance Corporation, 2021 BCSC 1841 (intentional act exclusion barring duty to defend)
- Northbridge General Insurance Corporation v XL Specialty Insurance Company, 2021 BCSC 1682 (duty to defend as between CGL and professional liability insurer)
- Northbridge Insurance Corporation v Trinidad Drilling Ltd., 2021 BCSC 836 (priorities between insurers, jurisdictional issues Alberta & B.C.)
- West Van Holdings Ltd. v Economical Mutual Insurance, 2019 BCCA 110 (successful appeal finding no insurance coverage for pollution and insureds not ordinarily entitled to full indemnity costs against insurers even if successful in coverage dispute)
- Economical Mutual Insurance v Gill, 2017 BCCA 351 (successful appeal finding no homeowner’s insurance coverage for third party claim brought against father of injured plaintiff)
- Northbridge General Insurance v DeTray, Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary Action No 1701-05005, Sept 21, 2017 (no insurance coverage for pilot car driver, jurisdiction properly with Alberta courts)
- Federated Insurance v Ironwood Building Systems, Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary Action No 1401-02247, Jan 12, 2015 (no insurance coverage due to late notice, no relief from forfeiture)
- Economical Mutual Insurance Company v Lloyd’s Underwriters, 2014 BCSC 979 (Petition compelling Lloyd’s Underwriters to undertake insured’s defence in an underlying Action)
- Lombard General Insurance v Canadian Direct Insurance, 2013 BCSC 40; 2013 BCCA 523 (successful defence of Lombard from attempt by Canadian Direct Insurance and Ford Credit Canada to compel Lombard to cover Canadian Direct’s insured)
- Lombard v Canadian Surety, 2012 BCSC 526 (successful application to compel co-insurer to contribute towards costs to defend insured)
- Progressive Homes v Lombard Insurance Company of Canada, 2010 SCC 33 (co-counsel for insurer before Supreme Court of Canada on CGL coverage matter)
- Teck Cominco v Lloyd’s Underwriters, 2009 SCC 11 (co-counsel for insurer before the Supreme Court of Canada in leading case on jurisdiction – forum non conveniens)
- Butterfield v Lombard Insurance, 2004 BCSC 1755 (defending property insurer against breach of contract claims)
- Lead counsel for two insurers in Workman Optometry v. Certas Home and Auto Insurance, 2023 ONSC 3356. Judgment in favour of insurers after a common issues trial. The Court answered the common issues in favour of the insurer defendants, finding no coverage for COVID-19 related business interruption losses.
- Douez v Facebook, 2022 BCSC 914, June 2022 decision following a common issues trial held in January 2022, finding Facebook breached class members’ Privacy Act rights through its Sponsored Stories advertising campaign.
- Lead counsel defending long term care homes and industries in alleged COVID-19 injury and death claims in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia
- Huebner v PR Seniors Housing Management Ltd., D.B.A. Retirement Concepts, 2020 BCSC 1290 and 2020 BCSC 1037 (successful defence on sequencing issues in class action) 2021 BCSC 837 (striking certification affidavits)
- Douez v Facebook, 2017 SCC 33 (Supreme Court of Canada upholding plaintiff’s right to sue Facebook in B.C. in the face of a click-wrap agreement requiring action only in California); 2018 BCCA 186 (upholding certification) 2014 BCSC 953 (successful application certifying class action against Facebook alleging breach of privacy); and 2012 BCSC 2097(sequencing motion in class action against Facebook)
- Lam v. University of British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 673 (successfully opposing motion in class proceeding to have third party proceedings tried concurrently with common negligence issues)
- Hoy v Medtronic, Inc., 2003 BCCA 316 (medical device class action certification decision)
- Sidhu v Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024. Successfully defended a “social host” through a 45 day trial. Claims in the millions of dollars were advanced against the social host by the quadriplegic plaintiff, who had been injured by the conduct of the intoxicated driver defendant, and by other defendants.
- Cannon v. Al Perrett Enterprises Inc., 2018 BCSC 337. Successful defence of motorcycle repair shop in claim for defective repairs and resulting accident.
- Kerr v Global Investments House, 2014 BCSC 1544. Successful defence of hotel against personal injury claim.
- Fentiman v BC SPCA, 2009 BCSC 1141. Successful defence of the British Columbia SPCA against conversion action in B.C. Supreme Court.
- Zhang v Garrison, 2009 BCSC 1741. Successful addition of a medical doctor as defendant in Richmond airplane crash case. Medical doctor sought immunity under the federal Aeronautics Act.
- Willey v Ronik Security Ltd., 2006 BCSC 1003. Upholding default damages judgment in property loss claim.
- ICBC v Lemare Lake Logging Ltd., 2003 BCSC 1906. Defence of logging company against subrogated recovery action by ICBC.
- McKinnon v. BCSPCA, 2020 BCSC 1933 – injunction against BCSPCA refused
- Bagga v BC SPCA, Farm Industry Review Board January 2019 (on behalf of the BC SPCA, successfully ensuring animals in distress not returned to owner)
- BC SPCA (Wild Animal Rehabilitation Centre) v Deputy Regional Manager, Recreational Fisheries and Wildlife Programs 2015-WIL-006 (Environmental Appeal Board, May 2016)
- Binnersley v BC SPCA, 2016 BCCA 259 (successfully arguing appellant brought moot appeal, appeal dismissed)
- Mason v Community Living Society, 2014 BCHRT 218 (summary dismissal of human rights complaint)
- McLeod v BCSPCA, British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board, July 15, 2014 (successful defence of BCSPCA’s conduct in seizing 99 malnourished cattle from the appellant’s ranch)
- Addo v Shekinah Homes Society, 2012 BCHRT 378 (successful application to dismiss human rights complaint before the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal)
- Johnson v BC SPCA, (B.C. Supreme Court, June 14, 2011) (successfully seeking imposition of terms respecting injunctive relief sought by petitioner)
- In the Matter of a Production Order (s. 487.012, Criminal Code) (BCPC, Feb 14, 2011) (successful application to compel production of Workers Compensation Board records for investigation into alleged massacre of 100 sled dogs at Whistler, B.C.)
- Ulmer v BC SPCA, 2010 BCCA 519 (counsel for the BC SPCA on appeal by animal owner contesting removal animals from her property and re.opposing application to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (2011 CanLII 35964)
- C. Rhone, J. MacMaster and W. Branch, Environmental Insurance Recovery: Legal Issues in Relation to the Buy-Back of Insurance Policies (CLEBC: 2008)
- C. Rhone and W. Branch, Insurance Issues in Class Actions, in Litigating and Managing Insurance Coverage Disputes, The Canadian Institute, Conference, June 17-18, 2008 (Toronto)
- C. Rhone, CGL Coverage and Long-Tail Pollution Claims: Several Triggering Issues Considered (CLEBC: 2008)
- Co-author (with Ward Branch),Liability Insurance Issues in Construction Practice, British Columbia (CLEBC: 2007)
- Co-author (with W. Branch), “Solving the National Class Problem”, 4th Annual Symposium on Class Actions (Toronto:Osgoode Hall Law School of York University , 2007)
- Co-author (with M. Wingert), The Settlement Conference: Cornerstone of the Small Claims Process, British Columbia (CLE: 2005)
- Co-author (with W. Branch), The Bond Between Class Members – The Wedge Between Counsel: Trans-National Class Actions in the Wake of Parsons v. McDonald’s Restaurants, British Columbia CLE (February, 2005)
- Co-author, Chaos or consistency? : The National Class Action Dilemma paper for symposium National forum on drug and medical device liability: key developments and cutting edge strategies for litigating ongoing claims and minimizing future exposures (Toronto: Canada Law Institute, 2003)
- Co-author, “‘If it Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix it!’ Does B.C. Need a New Costs Regime for Class Actions?” (2003) Vol. 1, No. 4 Class Action 82
- Author, “Accepting the Words of Parliament: Parliamentary History as a Means to Interpret Legislation” (September 2001) 59 The Advocate 697
- Author, Criminal Jury Addresses, CLE (B.C.) November 23, 2000 (Criminal Law Advocacy CLE)
- Co-Author with C. Tollefson and C. Rolfe, Cleanair.ca: A Citizen’s Action Guide(Vancouver: Sierra Legal Defence Fund, 2000)
- Author, “From the European Commission to National Courts” (1998) 2 Edinburgh Law Review 345